We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Rolling Stones

Hi guys, what do you think of these early Stones signatures?

Thanks

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

rolling stones.jpg, 658 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on July 1, 2019 at 2:18pm

100% Forgery

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Shaggy67 on July 3, 2019 at 9:09pm

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel Mumenthaler on July 2, 2019 at 11:21am

Well these are part of a lot with lots of other 60s sigs and I rather tend to "authentic". But am not a real Stones expert. Can anybody post some 1963 examples for comparison?

https://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/fieldings-auc...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel S. on July 2, 2019 at 11:37am

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolling-Stones-Signed-Autographed-Fan-Club...

These are ‘63 Stones signatures

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel Mumenthaler on July 2, 2019 at 1:05pm

These are from 1964 or later (Five By Five was only released in 64)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 2, 2019 at 1:13pm

+1 for detective work :)

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on July 2, 2019 at 2:23pm

Click on “View original item” for the ‘63 set.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 4, 2019 at 1:57pm

Ah! Thanks.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keithspoon1978 on July 2, 2019 at 11:44am

100% genuine

They are a 1963 set

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 2, 2019 at 12:30pm

I deleted my comment by mistake, sorry. Some of the autographs look so heavily, slowly or shakingly signed that they concern me. Compare them to fast and fluid ones on the album you linked to. It could be only that the newspaper wasn't on a firm surface, but I would be extra careful.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on July 2, 2019 at 12:59pm

There is no way these examples are authentic. In fact, they are the worst examples of Stones signatures I have ever seen. They are legible, yes and nicely written but they cannot possibly be real, ask Roger Epperson. I know because I own 2 Brian Jones, 2 Charlie Watts and 2 Bill Wyman -and they do NOT look anything like the ones in question, please people get an expert to look at them. I know I am only in my third year as collector, however, even I know they are fakes. I have studied Stones autographs and they don't match-not even close to the ones in question. You can even check, yourself by adding a name in the upper right box where it says: "search autograph live", example: type "Brian Jones", and the page will take you to several different examples of his autographs shown to this forum over the years and, you can see the ones that are genuine and the ones that are fakes. All it takes is a little patience. I would not say this if I wasn't 100% sure.