We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Authenticity is Everything
Rolling Stones - any thoughts?
Some of these look suspiciously like they may have come from the same Hand. Any thoughts?
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
-
-
lot136.jpg, 255 KB -
lot136-1.jpg, 216 KB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on
-
I do not like these either. We're see what others say but I'm gonna go with not authentic IMO
-
Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on
-
Could be that one Stone signed for them all. The J in Brian Jones looks really off.
-
Permalink Reply by heath emery on
-
Agreed brian jones looks different for sure. Ill post one thats some what similar to jagger etc.
- Attachments: No photo uploads here
-
-
image.jpg, 55 KB
-
-
Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on
-
I know the J in Jones looks different, but the rest of the signatures look good to me and seem early 60's signatures. The inscription looks to be from Keith.
-
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on
-
The "J" is really odd and threw me off too, but I also believe that these are authentic.
-
-
Yeah for sure these look good might even be an earlier set than I posted. Bands like the stones, The beatles were allways changing their signature and evolving on a month to month basis. These are great and I love the aged paper this is on! Cool!
Photos
Videos
Groups
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
