Rolling Stones - any thoughts?

Some of these look suspiciously like they may have come from the same Hand. Any thoughts? 

Views: 366

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on September 16, 2014 at 11:25am
I do not like these either. We're see what others say but I'm gonna go with not authentic IMO
Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on September 16, 2014 at 12:35pm

Could be that one Stone signed for them all.  The J in Brian Jones looks really off.

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 16, 2014 at 2:08pm
Agreed brian jones looks different for sure. Ill post one thats some what similar to jagger etc.
Attachments: No photo uploads here
Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on September 16, 2014 at 2:52pm
I know the J in Jones looks different, but the rest of the signatures look good to me and seem early 60's signatures. The inscription looks to be from Keith.
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 16, 2014 at 3:24pm

The "J" is really odd and threw me off too, but I also believe that these are authentic.

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 16, 2014 at 3:53pm
Yeah for sure these look good might even be an earlier set than I posted. Bands like the stones, The beatles were allways changing their signature and evolving on a month to month basis. These are great and I love the aged paper this is on! Cool!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service