We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Rolling Stones - any thoughts?

Some of these look suspiciously like they may have come from the same Hand. Any thoughts?

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

lot136.jpg, 255 KB
lot136-1.jpg, 216 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on September 16, 2014 at 11:25am

I do not like these either. We're see what others say but I'm gonna go with not authentic IMO

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on September 16, 2014 at 12:35pm

Could be that one Stone signed for them all. The J in Brian Jones looks really off.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 16, 2014 at 2:08pm

Agreed brian jones looks different for sure. Ill post one thats some what similar to jagger etc.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpg, 55 KB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on September 16, 2014 at 2:52pm

I know the J in Jones looks different, but the rest of the signatures look good to me and seem early 60's signatures. The inscription looks to be from Keith.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 16, 2014 at 3:24pm

The "J" is really odd and threw me off too, but I also believe that these are authentic.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by heath emery on September 16, 2014 at 3:53pm

Yeah for sure these look good might even be an earlier set than I posted. Bands like the stones, The beatles were allways changing their signature and evolving on a month to month basis. These are great and I love the aged paper this is on! Cool!