Perhaps I am too suspicious but over the last months a lot of Wings era autographs on scruffy paper appeared in several facebook groups. All with the "is this genuine?"-tag. Is someone producing them at home or could these all be good? I wonder as these type or autographs haven't come up for years and the figure of those similar scruffy ones is very strange. I fear they all base on authentic examples (as Paul signed as such mid 70s).
Thorston, this is an important discussion. Thanks for posting it. They do not look good to me but I don't want to point out my tells, at least not publicly.
I asked Roger Epperson for opinion on the red ink one at the down right Corner before placed a bid on it. He thought it is genuine. It was sold for 810 dollars and I didn't win the bid though.
The problem for all fans, experts and so called experts is - if you see one autograph you easily will say "authentic" - if more come up in a short space of time you get suscpicious. That's the reason fr my post. Some above could be good - but I assume at least half of them arent.
We had this quite often in the past. When one Paul signed Beatles album appeared a few years back all agreed it is good and the first ones got a COA from Frank. Then dozens more in a 1:1 authentic style appear and we now all agree that there are all fake.
Same goes for a certain Ringo autograph that appears to be a autopen (from a faker not Ringo) based on an authentic example.