Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Nate on November 10, 2017 at 8:42am

I wont comment on authenticity, but a point to note is if it was a late 60s Keith would have signed Richards not Richard.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spencerhill95 on November 10, 2017 at 9:29am

That's not true, "In 1963 their band manager, Andrew Loog Oldham, dropped the s from Richards' surname believing that "Keith Richard", in his words, 'looked more pop'.[3]:63 In the late 1970s Richards re-established the s in his surname." (Quoted from Wikipedia)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nate on November 10, 2017 at 10:39am

the history around what was placed on album covers and official releases you have stated I will not argue with, but all I can suggest is a bit of extra research into known and genuine late 60s Stones autographs and you will see the vast vast majority of Keiths are signed with the inclusion of a 's'.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spencerhill95 on November 10, 2017 at 10:46am

Didn't want to question your knowledge, I just thought he signed "Richard" because that was the commonly known version of his name. But thank you for your reply!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by MarkG on November 10, 2017 at 9:54am

Sorry hate to pop your balloon, its not authentic and the Brian Jones attempt is very poor indeed. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Spencerhill95 on November 10, 2017 at 10:51am

Ok, thank you anyway! At least it was free, guess now I know why... the next couple of days I will post further authenticity requests, all autographs from the same collector. I'm curious how often I got fooled

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by John William on November 10, 2017 at 10:26am

no good

• ▶ Reply