Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on February 21, 2015 at 2:24am

Maybe Aspinalls for 1 and 3.

Set 2 seems the best...but not 100% on these either

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on February 21, 2015 at 3:24am

None of the sets look right to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 21, 2015 at 4:36am

#1 looks to be the work of Neil Aspinall...

#2 looks the best...but...

#3 LOOKS to be the work of Mal Evans...he signed when Neil couldn't...which wasn't often...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 21, 2015 at 5:21am

none of these are authentic, imo

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 21, 2015 at 5:54am

Yeah,...I think #2 has to many problems... not authentic...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on February 21, 2015 at 6:18am

All three don't look authentic to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on February 21, 2015 at 6:48am

I figure #3 a regular old forgery. Seems strange the managers would bother with so many different pens.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on February 21, 2015 at 7:32am

You'd be surprised...some of the autopen signed first name fan club pics used all black on some pics...and others had blue AND black pens mixed.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on February 21, 2015 at 8:11am

Thanks for all the input thus far. All three of these sets are on offer at UK auction houses in the near future. Although the estimates are well below market prices they are not so low that you would instantly know that the sets are secretarial or forgeries and they are certainly not described as "signed on behalf of..". Makes you wonder why they don't do at least some due diligence. There is a Monroe of a similar ilk up next week too (high estimate £2k). You only need to Google MM signature study to find the same signature in RR's "secretarials".

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• monroe_1.jpg, 256 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on February 21, 2015 at 12:38pm

Sorry, none of those sets sets are real.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by bernie chatzky on February 24, 2015 at 5:28pm

None of them, # 1 is pathetic.

But I guarantee you with time this **person** doing this autographs will achieve to fool many people, he/she is getting good.

Not an opinion, this is a statement.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Thorsten Knublauch on February 24, 2015 at 11:42pm

1 Aspinall

2 + 3 Fake by "someone"

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page