Views: 497

Replies to This Discussion

Was it signed on stage? Looks rushed, even n a hurry KL is always pretty clean
The Loggins sig looks a little slow and sloppy to me. I have a Loggins a few years old in my album that you can compare it with.

My my, one person says rushed, one says slow.  I have only compared it to ones I have searched for in Google images.  They all seem similar to me, including the one I posted.  Unfort I have no history on where or when the album was signed..

Did you post one? Think I missed it. Part that gets me on this when you blow it up is the hiccup at the end of the L. Just doesn't look natural to me.

Are you going by the one signature you have or have you seen multiples?  Anyway you can post yours?  Here is another one I found on Google , same album, similar postion and signature.  There are others very similar also.

I have 2 Loggins but have seen more then a few. Not real familiar with Messina. I'm not saying the sig is bad just off from some I've seen in person. All of them in the last few years. Not sure how old these sigs are.

How do you know all these googled signatures are good?

I dont.  But when I want to try & sample signatures of people, I start with that and Ebay as a base.    So many of the Loggins I see are similar to the one I posted, I figured the LP was OK.  From what I know its a pretty recent signature, last year or so.

Ok. Just when I google anyone the signatures that pop up are not always good.

I'll use examples from in person collectors I know or I'll look through Rogers stuff for examples.

After doing a little lookin in my collection, I give it a thumbs up. Im guessing  that it depends on the item, guitars they sign much slower

The second is wrong

The second LP? 

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service