We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Hi all.  I just wanted to ask, is a TRACKS authentication as good as a frank caiazzo, psa, jsa? Would you approach an item authenticated by TRACKS with more concern?  Just not familiar with them and wanted to gather some opinions.

Views: 2295

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I would agree that Tracks and Caiazzo are best Beatles autograph authenticators, perhaps now more than ever before.

Your right there, ballroom.....100%

I would like to add Perry Cox to the Beatles authenticators list

Definitely Perry also. I personally would need to see a Frank, Perry or Tracks COA to be comfortable enough to spend the amount of money that these items demand. 

Thanks again all. So very helpful. Appreciate everyone's responses!

Frank Caiazzo, Tracks, and Perry Cox are the top 3 and the gold standard in Beatles autograph authentication. I wouldn't buy one without one of those three, but still always ask AML members opinions too if you still feel uncomfortable. 

Thank you Adam!

Good response Adam

Ask as many opinions as possible. 

If all eyes agree then the purchase is more solid. 

I've come to learn that no one is perfect. 

I want a mtn of provenance and opinions if I'm gonna lay down large sacks of coin.

It still remains the utmost importance to study. 

Ryan - did you notice that PSA and JSA weren't even mentioned in the responses (until now)?

Simply put, Tracks is fine. 

LOL.  Yes.  I take it that those two are better with Sports figures than with entertainers.  

I'd put Epperson WAY up there on the Beatles. He's in my top 3, with Frank and Tracks. 

What's unimprovable is when 2-3 top people share info and opinions. That doesn't happen enough.

Nigel Lemon at The Beatles MarketPlace is also a good authenticator.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service