We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

The Jackie Gleason Autograph Thread! Genuine examples from every period! Cavalcade of Secretarials! Saddleman, Spear and Marilyn Gleason!

***************************************************************

The October 27th, 2018 update is what should be seen here first so until the rewrite it is below:

PRESENTING! THE CULMINATION OF THIS PROJECT! FIRST TIME EVER?!

Jackie Gleason's secretarial signature sources (and 1 wife) BY NAME (where possible). The vast bulk of the secretarials out there will be by Spear from the later 1970's on to 1987 on anything in felt tip, usually black, and then Saddleman on the 1950's postcards in blue fountain ink most often. Forgeries are of course more common than anything. After those and the secretarials shown by name below, the signing secretarials are encountered (infrequently, fountain and often ballpoint, on portraits mostly), then Marilyn Gleason (ballpoint and perhaps 1 fountain pen so far C. 1970's,), and last...finally, The Great One (pencil, fountain (black and blue with some oddities in the late 1960's), ballpoint (usually blue), felt tip (black and blue) etc.).

"...And away we go!..."

Click for large image please.This image has been updated October 29, 2018 to show the largest examples clearly.

Photo reposted Oct. 30th, 2018. PM 10.29.18 Improved with better, larger scans, more accurate date windows and expanded to show a later Saddleman as well (!):

******************************************************************

And the "old" article, undergoing full revision follows...


Hello,

I thought this composite might be useful in identifying the rampant secretarials of Jackie Gleason's signature that are offered, both raw and certified. The topic has risen before, but I did not see this all laid out simply and clearly labeled. Gleason's authentic signature is very rare in any form. Almost everything out there is a secretarial or poor forgery, especially the 1970's signatures, although this is changing now (10/28/18) as the forgers attempt to create 1950's signatures. The comments below concern the scans above as shown.

The authentic example from 1951 shown is typical of this period, not terribly neat, sometimes slightly flowery if messy, and with a rather bouncy base line (especially early examples) in "jackie", which often appears as "jockie". Note the overall shape and slight lean of the "a" in Jockie" compared to the secretarials (much more round). Note the attack of the "jackie", the connection of the "j" to the "a", and the clear construction and articulation of the "k" (hooking back and under). Sometimes the "e" in "jackie" is a touch higher than the "i" and leans back a bit to the left. Also note the differences in the formation of the "g" in "gleason" with the 1950's secretarial (and the form of the "ason"). The "a" in "gleason" is often complex and dense as it goes back on itself. Ink dispersal shows a rather quick hand compared to all the secretarials, with most ink in the last "a". Authentic examples are very hard to find and rather expensive if identified. Very early examples show him singing both names in a single line, even almost connecting first and last names, but then he started signing on two lines by C. 1949. Gleason's signature remained more or less the same, sometimes taking on a more extreme slant, until the early 1960's, after which it became a bit more scrawled and often more simplified. Most authentic examples appear to come from the 1950's and are often found on album pages; examples from the 1960's can be found on playbills and theater programs as well as other items. From what little I have seen, most all later examples (mid 1970's and on) exhibit more variation and extreme simplification in the last years and are seldom encountered. They should be priced accordingly.

The 1950's secretarials are easily spotted by an overall drawn quality, extreme neatness, straight baseline, even ink dispersal/pressure, and the very similar "j" and "g" bottom loops. Do not ignore this. The formation of the letters in first and last names is very different - the first "a" is often quite round, and the "ason" in "gleason" is quite different from the authentic (see the elongated space between the "a" and "s" in the secretarial) and is always legible (true of most all secretarials), with no ending trail off that melds the final letters. This is important. Early examples can show an elongated thinner "j" (now added in a composite scan posted below), but are readily betrayed by the rest of the signature which displays hesitance and the drawn quality and form. These 3.5" x 5" secretarials exist in quantity, yet I believe are still quite collectible as period items - if you wrote to the Jackie Gleason Show during the 1950's this is indeed what you would have received. Very few if any of these bear authentic signatures. They were usually signed by secretary Patricia Saddleman, who admitted to signing all of his mail at the time on a broadcast (1956) of What's My Line.

*

The 1960's secretarials are even more obvious with very even ink dispersal, a very different overall slant compared to either the authentic or earlier secretarials, a straight base line, a different formation overall and of the last name in particular. The "j" in "jackie" is not connected to the "a" as the authentic. The capitalized "E" in "glEason" first appears about C. 1959 on the earlier C. 1954 PC's images, many times from the same source but I digress. They bear ballpoint signatures that appear much like the 1960's version(s). Several examples exist with the capital "E" ALL c. 1959/60, so that one can distinguish the forged from the secretarial apart from the other problems. Note the opposing slants of the "j" and "k" in "jackie" compared with the authentic example - same holds true for the 1970's and 1980's. These 3.5" x 5" secretarials with the "E" do not show up as frequently as the earlier 1950's 3.5" x 5" secretarials which are comparatively common. There is another scarcer 3.5" x 5" early 1960's (Perhaps 1963) version showing Gleason on stage in front of curtains with a raised arm - I have seen this version bear the shown 1960's secretarial signatures (not all with "E") and, very rarely, a genuine signature. If my memory serves, I have seen a very few stamped versions of just the standing pose from Miami.

The 1970's secretarials, as those of the 1980's, are also very neat and exhibit very consistent ink dispersal even if more fluidly executed. These later secretarials are usually accompanied with the inscription "My Best Wishes" and a "dash" "-"; and display a slant to the right, posses a readily identifiable "j", and the "k" is formed very much like the "i" and "e" - with all reaching the same height. There is usually a space before and/or after the "a" in "jackie" (lone "a"),and often a space before the "a" in "gleason". The last name appears to be broken into two or three segments. There can be some variation of the "g" (thinner bottom loop, angular tipped) but the rest of the signature will quickly confirm the secretarial (the "j", which sometimes has a loop at the top and a slightly varying flourish, and then the "g"). These secretarials are extremely common, generally accepted as genuine, and are usually seen on 8" x 10" cast signed bus photographs (with the rest often authentic), fan letters, personal portraits and, later, 5" x 7" portraits. The signature is almost always in black felt tip without regard to what the item is; this allows ready examination of the ink and pressure changes which will reveal the secretarial. The presence of a "dash" is problematic -  limited to secretarials only - I have yet to see a genuine example with a "dash". As of 11/23 this holds true.

Below is another authentic vintage signature - a superb example in pencil that dates to shortly after the 1951 example above. It is a wonderful example of the true signature of The Great One.

Additional authentic signatures from 1944 to 1961 can be see here (the 1948 example is very useful, but they all are of great value in this discussion), as well as a confirmed common secretarial from the 1970's:

Jackie Gleason Confirmed Authentic Exemplars at The Classic Enterta...

Note: If you have an authentic Gleason signature or another type of secretarial from any period and would like to share it for the purposes of this article please contact me. Member Bob Shinn also has a superb example, but I wont post images w/o permission.

Eric

A large scan of the 1951 has been added as an attachment below.

Closing notes: It is sometimes said that Gleason's wife signed for him. She did! Marilyn Gleason, starting early, in about 1965. Gleason was married 1936-1970, 1970-1975, and 1975-1987. From what I have seen the "My Best Wishes" secretarials, which represent the overwhelming majority of signatures, start to appear on photographs from about 1975 on. The presence of this inscription does not equate with being a secretarial, but this is often the case. I also note the lack of any transitional examples of the secretarials. The little I have seen appears forged or unusual in some odd way. His authentic signature mutated slightly over the years while retaining basic elements, yet the secretarials just change violently. I have never seen the 1960's style secretarial signature shown in the composite above, whose appearance seems to correlate with his move to Miami in 1962, on anything but these small photographs from this period.

This article is under construction. Updated October 26, 2018 with much additional information and a new scan showing the most encountered secretarial signatures with the names of those who signed them along with Marilyn Gleason. © EKL 2018

Tags: Gleason, Jackie, autograph, forgery, genuine, secretarial

Views: 16193

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Thanks Scott :) This SP is amazing - so glad I was able to post it for reference. Loving the "w" ;)

I like the "w" too! ;)

And a Carney SP just as large :)

Click twice for full image:

gorgeous pictures, eric! simply amazing, thanks for sharing!

Thanks Jason :) They are very useful. Gleason can be a bit slippery with fountain on glossy! Then again he might have been using Scotch as a solvent in his pen ;)

That is a great early Art Carney again more writing than normal with his. 

Thanks, it is a nice one. And typical of his earlier hand. Nice signature he had. Very regular and consistent.

Hello Eric,

I've been a student of Jackie Gleason's signature for many years, and most of what I learned, I learned from you.  So thanks!

I saw a Gleason autograph on eBay yesterday that I hesitated on and which sold quickly but I'm fairly certain it was good.  For my own understanding, could you please take a look at it and let me know your thoughts?  The attached image is the best I can get.

There's both a printed signature and a live one on this photo.  The hand-written "My Very Best" inscription looks dead on to other exemplars in my file and makes me think the rest is good.  The hand-written signature, which is placed just below the printed signature, looks pretty good too although it's possibly a bit atypical as he tried to squeeze his last name into the remaining white space.  According to a notation on the back of the photo from the original collector, this autograph was signed on July 28, 1952.

Anyway, thanks again for all of the insight into the Great One's John Hancock.  In large part because of your work, I was able to finally track down an authentic Gleason a few years ago and I treasure it.

Greg

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Hello Gregory,

Thank you for the nice comments. I appreciate the nice words. I will look over the Gleason later - it appears a bit odd for 1952. Seller has secretarials for sale - common ones like 1930's Bette Davis, from the same collection ("To Audrey' etc) so that was TTM suggesting more were - many 5x7's which are 80% secretarial by the numbers/percentages. The sold $103 Garland and $165 Bud & Lou seem a bit off as well...the Eddie G. Robinson appears OK (8x10) but unsold at $60. Would like to see your own Gleason :) Have you found my set of vintage signed photos in here?

It is odd - it appears blue ball point for the inscription and black fountain for the signature? Very interesting. I have seen preprints before where the celeb hand inscribes and either just leaves the preprinted sig to suffice (De Kelley) or the secretary adds a signature. But I have no conclusion yet. Looks like fun :)

Thank you, Eric.  I wasn’t 100% sure on this one and so I waited.  Perhaps too long but that’s the way it goes sometimes.

It doesn’t match any of the secretarial patterns I’m familiar with and the inscription part looks authentic to me.  Jackie’s upper case “M” and “B” are really distinctive as is the way he crosses his “t” at the end of a word.  I’m not aware of any his secretaries who were able to match his cursive writing so closely apart from the signature itself.

As for the signature, this one has most of the things I’ve come to look for in authentic Gleasons but for some reason I just wasn’t certain.  I think part of the problem is that it’s not a great scan so we can’t really see the texture of the ink.  That would be a big help.  Also, he seems to have scrunched the last name up a bit as he started running out of room, which complicates the analysis.

I will track down my Gleason and send you a photo but it may take a bit.  I filed it away probably 3 years ago now but the question is which folder.  I remember it’s a blue ballpoint signature with a dedication and inscription on the back of a tavern’s business card.

Thanks again for your thoughts on this Gleason. I think it’s a very instructive case study one way or the other and your input is absolutely invaluable.

Greg

Hi Greg,

An interesting case indeed. From memory and this on a Saturday night: The baseline of the first name is odd, the space between the "j" and "a" seems a bit much but then the "a" has that little angle lower left, the lack of the "jockie" appearance is notable, the opposing angles/slants of the "j" and the "k" seem perhaps exaggerated, the "kie" also is just odd (seen such a "k" once and not sure of it), the last name "G" does appear uncertain/jerky when usually rather smooth, the "eas" - not the usual dense inked "a" although I have seen the straight "l" and the simple "e" before. The "son" appears rather reasonable but he usual trails off down, not up. I will comment on the inscription when I can look at my files. 

And of course, thank you for the kind comments :) I am glad someone besides Scott and Tony etc. has been reading this! :) I am very pleased you found it useful. :)

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service