Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jeff on July 17, 2019 at 3:39pm

It appears I wasn't able to upload the photo from my iPad.  Trying this one more time.  Thank you everybody for your opinions on this. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff on July 17, 2019 at 3:43pm

Test

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff on July 17, 2019 at 5:50pm

I’ve tried 4 different times to upload another picture of the autograph, but the site isn’t displaying it for some reason.  I’m stumped.  

Anyway, thanks to everybody for your feedback.   I agree that it has differences compared to the examples from PSA and Beckett that I’ve been able to locate online, but I can also see similarities so I was hoping that some of the community on this site would chime in based off what they’ve seen in the past.  Your feedback was appreciated.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Woody2Shoes on July 19, 2019 at 7:43pm

Jeff, the whole shebang is off, from the time the forger put the pen on the paper, IMO. Everything is wrong. It's a real hodgepodge. A little from here, some from there. The forgery equivalent of cutting out words from magazines and pasting them on paper to create a ransom note and the way all the elements connect, the proportions, the flow here is so far off as to leave little doubt as to this being a forgery.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by bndroid on July 19, 2019 at 8:23am

I would say no to this one. There are noticeable characteristics in the "L" I do not like. The spacing between his first and last name also worries me a bit as they do not seem to flow. It's as though there was a pause in between signing this.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Peter Mayer on August 9, 2019 at 4:48pm

Not. Even. Close.  There is nothing in this autograph that remotely resembles an authentic Bruce Lee signature.  Not a single letter is accurate and the dragon symbol is laughable given how bad it is.  The forger didn’t even bother figuring out how Bruce inscribed the symbol.  Try again. 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page