We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Tags:
Provided they're not stamped, the autographs look pretty good to me.
The part that bothers me the most is the extended lower portion of the M in Mantle.
Steve, I totally get what you're saying, I sometimes split hairs with an autograph. But if you look at the autograph as a whole, the fluidity, and other things that make it genuine. If that's not authentic, it's definitely one of the better forgeries I've seen. I still think it's fine. It's funny, you pointed to the mantle, I was looking at the "a" in DiMaggio, that looks like an e and although I believe wholeheartedly it's authentic, it certainly caught my eye. DiMeggio. Lol. Hopefully, everybody else will chime in.
The e in DiMaggio caught my eye too, but didn’t bother me because I have an in person signed like that.
the signatures are authentic. As long as live ink.
Absolutely authentic.
I like it too! I would like to get my grubby chubby paws on this one myself. You don't see a ton of those around with the cheesy 1980's plaque that are authentic. I think the cheesy plaque is also a good sign in this case. If it's not a photo copy it's a score.
You can usually take one out easily, as Steve Zarelli's video shows you.
https://live.autographmagazine.com/profiles/blogs/3524372:BlogPost:...
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service