Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on January 13, 2020 at 6:59pm

I believe this is authentic.  See what others think though.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 13, 2020 at 7:20pm

Joey, the image is too pixelated to authenticate from. We can't tell what the photo really looks like. It needs to be a high-quality JPG or PNG.

You only posted the autograph. Always post images of the entire piece, as many images as you can.

The autograph is the same color as the photo. Not a great sign.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joey Farino on January 13, 2020 at 7:20pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael Brown on January 13, 2020 at 9:27pm

IMO..Not even close.  Let’s start out with the hestitation and huge space between the a and b.. plus the angle of the E..ugh..now how bout that R..and The abrupt finish in Ruth....

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on January 13, 2020 at 11:55pm

You’ve convinced me.  Good points all.  I hereby change my opinion!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Woody2Shoes on January 14, 2020 at 7:34pm

+1  The e and R partitioning, the telemetry of the end of the 'e' (that the forger tilted almost into a 'w', as many forgers do tend to do) and the starting point and angle of the 'R' is a disaster of epic proportions. Don't even need to consider other features/tells once focused on that horrific e B.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ITguy1984 on January 14, 2020 at 10:49am

also a super straight baseline I might add

• ▶ Reply