Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on October 16, 2020 at 4:17pm

The autograph is atypical.  I would be shocked if it passed a TPA.  The “G” in “Good” is where any examination should begin and end.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on October 26, 2020 at 4:40pm

This Guinness would have been signed in-person on the streets. it is 100% real.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lewis H on October 26, 2020 at 4:52pm

Thanks Pete. Have you ever seen one which looks similar though? I have spent hours going through the internet and not seen another which either has the letters looped in the surname or the 'o's joined like that in 'Good'. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on October 26, 2020 at 5:51pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on October 26, 2020 at 5:52pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on October 26, 2020 at 5:54pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on October 26, 2020 at 5:55pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on October 26, 2020 at 6:00pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on October 26, 2020 at 6:03pm

Permalink Reply by Lewis H on October 27, 2020 at 2:18am

Thanks Pete. Those examples are exactly how I would expect an Alec Guinness autograph to look, which is still slightly different to the one that I posted. The 'o's in 'Good' are jointed differently in the one that I posted, and the letters in his surname are looped. I can't see those characteristics in any of the ones which you have just posted. 

Permalink Reply by Lewis H on October 22, 2020 at 12:00pm

Hello everyone,

What are your thoughts on this Alec Guinness autograph? (There are other autographs on this card too). 

I have posted further information about them here: https://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/thoughts-on-this-al...

It is from 1952. 

Thanks,

Lewis

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on October 22, 2020 at 12:01pm

Looks typical for the era.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 62
• 63
• 64
• 65
• 66
• 67
• Next ›
• Page