We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Here’s the description:

Studio One, EMI Studios, Abbey Road in London, Saturday 24. June 1967
The Beatles announced that on 25.June they were be appearing on the 'Our World' global live television broadcast.
Before that, orchestral rehearsals were performed in the EMI studio on Abbey Road.
The Beatles and EMI threw open on 24.June the usually closed Abbey Road studio doors to more than a hundred journalists and photographers for a press-call.
The Journalist Graham Morris was there and got an autograph from the Beatles.
The signatures are on a off white notebook-sheet, in blue ink and the size of the sheet is 4.3 x 6.3 inches.
I give guarantee that the signatures are not a copy, print or preprint and original signed with pen. Since the Beatles did not sign in front of my own eyes, I offer it as a reproduction. The Beatles autograph experts will recognize it.
Ready to frame.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/224452716857

Tags: 1967, Beatles, sammlerobjekte, susannesusu123

Views: 2910

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Exactly, but the item in the OP actually sold for $1,250.

Honestly, if two times it is written that it is a reproduction, then it is your own fault if you offer so much. 

"...The Beatles autograph experts will recognize it...”

This would be the Third indication of a reproduction.

Probably the autograph is so good, that people don't care. I don't know. 

It’s obviously a way of enticing someone into thinking they’re getting a bargain by falsely claiming uncertainty.

I think the offer is okay. Nothing authentic is offered and twice pointed out reproduction.
Who nevertheless bids because it could be a bargain, should first clarify the withdrawal conditions with the seller.
Personally, I would never bid on something that is offered as a reproduction. 

It’s okay to knowingly sell a forgery with false provenance for a substantial amount of money as long as it’s offered as a reproduction?

Not in my book, or yours. Unfortunate to see this.

I wonder if people truly can see themselves for how awful they are? 

Justifying a scam on someone because they didn't catch the wording... 

I do believe in karma. 

If it is mentioned that it is a reproduction, I do not care about the provenance. But I understand what you mean, if a reproduction is sold, there is no need to give a false provenance. People want to make a bargain and bid a lot for a reproduction and probably sell it later as authentic and get more money than the purchase price. 

I agree Eric and Adam. It’s taking advantage of someone to the tune of $1,250 and then trying to rationalize it. The other person deserved it.

Susanne DeKerk, are you the seller of the item in the OP?

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service