Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on September 12, 2021 at 12:50pm

I bit unusual but I am leaning toward authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 12, 2021 at 12:54pm

Im leaning towards fake. Any RS experts? 

On second thoughts, they are certainly fake.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on September 12, 2021 at 1:05pm

I am not sure on those. I think possibly no good too.

Here are my 1963 signatures for comparison.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 12, 2021 at 1:13pm

I, personally, think there are issues with all individual autographs. I'm not a rolling stones expert, but they don't look authentic for various reasons.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 12, 2021 at 1:19pm

For me the large rip would eliminate it immediately.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on September 12, 2021 at 4:25pm

This comment about the rip being a deal breaker is a certainly valid opinion.  Would this be a good candidate for a proper paper restoration?  A skilled conservator could do a pretty seamless job since the tear looks to be clean (that is, if it's authentic!).

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 12, 2021 at 1:43pm

Anyone else think they are good?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on September 12, 2021 at 4:27pm

What's written on the back of this?  It looks like there is some show through from writing on the verso.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 12, 2021 at 5:21pm

I'm sure if you offered him £200 he would take it. I'm not an expert when it comes to Rolling stones, but I can recognise a fake when I see it. 

What's written on the back? Probably "sucker"

I think what Eric meant was the tear was a red flag

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on September 12, 2021 at 5:58pm

How would the tear be a red flag? I think finding out what's on the back is a valid question.  It's all part of getting the whole picture.  I'm kind of thinking along the same lines as Joe W.

Who's offering this?  That's also a factor that would be helpful to know to get a sense of things.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on September 12, 2021 at 7:48pm

Condition, nothing to do with authenticity. It is a serious tear. I stay well away from damaged and restored items. I see them as problems. Undamaged original for me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on September 12, 2021 at 9:01pm

An unblemished vintage item is ideal.  Unfortunately, vintage can mean showing it's age and having been subjected to less than ideal conditions over decades.  I have had pieces restored in the past to remove stains, replace borders, remove emulsion on glossy photos, etc..  For me it was a sense of curating the past....especially something unique.  I did stay away from the ink itself and instructed the conservationist to do so.

I've also purchased restored material if I knew it was something I would likely not see another of.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page