We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

I always have the hardest time with Jimmy Stewart autographs, I really can’t tell the difference between autopens and the real thing for him. I saw Steve Zarelli’s blog here on his autopen patterns, but I find it hard to see the shakiness and hard stops typical of autopens that he states in those examples. Also those examples were all signed ‘Jimmy’ and mine is ‘James’. So I guess a big question I have is does he have autopen patterns of ‘James’ out there as well? As Steve stated he was good at actually signing into the early ‘’90s, and this example is from a letter dated 1984, so perhaps this has a better chance of being real? Also just wondering do the breaks in the ink like in the ‘J’ and ‘S’ indicate a more natural occurrence or more indicative of an autopen machine? What do you guys think? Thanks!

Views: 181

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This scan appears highly over-contrasted. Crossover is not visible.

Sorry, I don’t quite understand what you mean? I thought it was a pretty detailed close up? What exactly is crossover? Thanks for the speedy reply!

Crossover is where you can see ink lying over ink as where one stroke goes over another such as the cross on a "t".  Stamps for example do not exhibit crossover. This visual should explain overexposure:

Click for full uncropped image.

Thanks so much for the explanation Eric! So your thoughts is that this may be a stamp if crossover is not seen in person on this example? That might also be a cause for the skips in the J and S? Was he known for using a stamp?

Most welcome but that is NOT what I meant. I only mentioned stamps to explain crossover. It doesn't show in your images because they are totally bleached out. Look closely at the Gleason below for crossover.

Here’s the only other photo posted of it. Not sure if this helps.

Even if I tilt my screen I can not see the papers edge on the right - bleeds right into the screen/site.

Here is a scan I made that allows you to see accurately:

Where the pen has gone back over itself there is 2x the ink - darker. That is an example of crossover.

An Autopen, being a signature signed by a machine with a pen, will also exhibit crossover. 

Now please don't take that to mean I think it is an Autopen.

Hi Greg -  Good to see you here.  I dropped you a message if you would like to check your inbox.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service