Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2024 at 9:54pm

That is HIDEOUS IMO. $1450 and time to go? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by startrekmaniac on April 7, 2024 at 10:16pm

Sorry you think the signature is hideous?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2024 at 10:22pm

The ink and signature are of very poor quality. To me it is fatal.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by startrekmaniac on April 7, 2024 at 10:38pm

Why do you say that?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2024 at 10:46pm

I don't understand the question. What is positive about this? The ink is a mess, the adhesion looks spotty, the signature itself is a mess. What is the upside? It is also atypical...it looks like it says "Jam Nicktot".

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by startrekmaniac on April 7, 2024 at 10:44pm

He seems to have a sloppy signature. Here’s a graded encapsulated picture from Beckett. I’m assume it’s legit. 

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• IMG_0078.png, 3.7 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2024 at 10:59pm

Even that does not suffer the severe problems of that Funko. BTW, from a year ago - "Funko Pop! figurines to be trashed as company moves to throw out $30 million worth in excess" - that would give me pause. 

"The maker of the Funko Pop! collectibles plans to toss millions of dollars' worth of its inventory, after realizing it has more of its pop culture figurines than it can afford to hold on to.

Waning demand for the pop culture vinyl toys, combined with a glut of inventory, is driving the loss as the company hits a financial rough patch.

The inventory has filled the company's warehouses to the brim, forcing Funko to rent storage containers to hold the excess product. And now, the product is worth less than it costs to keep on hand."

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Josh Board NEW & Improved on April 7, 2024 at 10:20pm

I think the spelling of the name NICHOLSON in the title of the post is hideous ;-)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 7, 2024 at 10:22pm

Well, I just left it at "typo".

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on April 8, 2024 at 2:42am

Could be authentic, although sloppy.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 8, 2024 at 5:43am

My concern was the condition/quality. I was not addressing authenticity.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eddy on April 8, 2024 at 6:20am

I'd agree with Mike.  Sloppy is a way to describe it but looks like it could be right.   This isn't to my personal tastes either .... but we are a diverse bunch in the hobby!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page