Hello!

I have a seller offering my these autographs (Disney, Hitchcock and Sinatra) that he claims he has inherited from his late father...

He doesn't know much about them, Disney should be from 1959 to 1963, the other two has he no info about...

I think the Disney-autograph has some simularities with this one:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Walt-Disney-Signed-Autographed-8x10-Vintage...

and Hitchcock with this:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Movie-Director-Alfred-Hitchcock-Signed11x14...

What do you think?

Thanks for helping!
 

Views: 1132

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

What is the Hitchcock signed on?  What type of writing instrument was used?  Is there also a profile sketch?  Hitchcock would add a profile sketch at times to his signature.

Thanks for your answer!

It's signed on a thick white paper with a blue pen. He's not sure what kind of pencil/pen, but it's not a felt-tip pen. No sketch...

I have doubt about the Disney I think I have seen similar autograph drawing.

It might be traced!?

I dont know about Sinatra or Hitchcock

Excuse my bad english, what do you mean with "traced"?

The Hitchcock looks pretty typical but I am not an expert.  I am very curious about the "H" though.  I am also very suspicious about the Disney sketch as well.  "Traced" means someone placed a piece of paper over a signature or sketch and drew the same image on top of the original provided that the original was visible through the paper.

I would ask a lot of questions before purchasing these items.  How did the seller's father acquire them?  Why is the seller selling them since they should obviously hold some sentimental value?  Some things are just too good to be true and that Disney piece certainly fits that description in my opinion.

Ok, thanks for explaining!

But if the Disney-autograph were traced, wouldn't it been slowly signed? This, to me anyway, seems to have a good "flow"...

The seller says that his father were a drummer in a orchestra/big band that toured US in the late 50s, early 60s and that's how he got the autographs. The seller himself isn't in any way interested in autographs and that's why he sells...

If Hitchcock signed in the late 1950s he would probably have added a profile sketch since his TV show was already on the air by then.  I am not saying that this is a definite way to authenticate his signature but I would feel much better if a profile sketch were added to the signature.  It may be authentic but the lack of a profile sketch and the suspicious "A" would scare me away personally.  Sorry.

Ok, thanks for taking the time to help me!

Post a link to this discussion as a comment on Bob Shinn's profile and ask for his opinions. I'm concerned about all of them. They look slowly signed to me, which is not how people naturally sign their signatures. 

I just did that, thanks for the tip!!
I would pass on all three. The Disney is definitely lacking the flourish his sig should have, the Sinatra looks slowed and thick, and the Hitchcock also quite slow. Plus, I am always very cautious of 50 year old signatures on torn out looking pages.
You know your stuff, Jeffrey.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service