We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Hello 

I collected an ONLINE OPINION from 4 major authenticators and their opinions are different: 2 yes, 2 no!!

Could you help me?

What do you think about it?

Bruce

 

Tags: BEATLES

Views: 807

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Looks like it was written by one person. In my opinion not authentic.

I dont like them

I agree with Jake. They look signed by the same person.

Which "major authenticators" did you use and what were their verdicts?

They don't look authentic to me either.

One thing's for sure, none of them are typical looking signatures. There is something about this set that gives the impression that they might just have been signed in a restricted place, the non-typical slant on the 'J' in John, the poorly formed star under Ringo (I'd have thought a forger would have made a better attempt at forming this), the abrupt ending to McCartney.

With Beatles autographs commanding the prices that they do, I wouldn't risk my money on this set, on the other hand I can see why the online authenticators are split in their opinions.

The "R" in "Ringo" would seem to be a big clue. The line forming the top of the "R" appears to continue down to the base of the signature. 

its actually the "Starr" that bothers me more than anything with these signatures.

Absolutely in agreement with Ballroomdays67 on this set. Should be noticeable to even an untrained eye!

no way.

the "a" in mccartney, starr and harrison are close to being the same, also the "L" in paul and "h" in john has the same flow, signer just slanted some of the names.

What authenticators said yes to that?

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service