We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Any opinions? Chris, what do you think?

Views: 908

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

My first reaction is, is the No 7 in a different pen?
I took a second look at the No. 7 and it appears to be in the same pen, at least color wise.

Some/most may disagree with me, but I just don't like this one.

It's fine in my opinion

I dont have a problem with the actual graph the blow up and blurry image is messing with my eyes though.

I hear you. I took the photo with my phone and tried to get a good close up. I get a little headache when I stare at it.

Looks good to me. 

The A-N bothering me. Paging Mr Williams.

I have seen a few n's like this, but I agree on the a, it bothers me a little also, it is a little small, usually larger. The other part that others me is the tight side of the M in Mantle.

In my opinion, the issue is you cannot see the flow of the ink in this photo... all we get is "shape." 

Was it signed quickly with streaks in the ink or [a bit too] carefully applied?

Additionally, seeing the signature in the context of the whole photo may help as well to gauge size and placement.

In my opinion, the jury is still out on this example, but I am not loving the undersized "an," the sharp angle on the right side of the second M, and overall it looks a bit "tight." If a better photo showed great flow, I might feel more positive about it.

Steve, I agree with you completely. Here is a little wider, hopefully better shot of the signature.
Attachments: No photo uploads here

Now seeing that image I would avoid but still small

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service