Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on October 17, 2015 at 11:52am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on October 17, 2015 at 12:18pm

perfect Ballroom. this not only shows a similar M, with the 3rd hump higher (still unusual) but clearly shows where the C is formed.

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on October 17, 2015 at 8:13am

Please post the autograph, Daniel. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on October 17, 2015 at 9:21am

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on October 17, 2015 at 8:22am

Is it the one in your photographs from Tel Aviv that you have photo proof of him signing?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on October 17, 2015 at 9:20am

Yes!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ricardo on October 17, 2015 at 2:09pm

In the past I have sent some in person McCartney autographs to the auctioneers - Christie's and Sothebeys for valuations, only to get a reply saying that in their opinion they are not genuine ! Ok, these were by no means great, perfect signatures (which is why I was considering selling them), but it's quite worrying really

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on October 17, 2015 at 10:05pm

Ric if you still have those mccartney signatures any chance of posting them just so we could have a look out of interest. Yes it is worrying. I just want to look at what's being rejected,but not to point the finger

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ricardo on October 18, 2015 at 8:36am

..there have been 4 that the auctioneers were doubtful of, two of them I no longer have, the other two I have uploaded in this discussion- the signature on revolver looks atypical I suppose (and the first hump of the M is small), the other one of Paul with a bit of the letter M looks nice I think (although abbreviated). Anyway, I got them in person myself so I,'m happy and not looking to sell them. The revolver was signed a bit rushed as there were a number of people around, the other was signed quite relaxed with only me there.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on October 18, 2015 at 11:13am

That's too bad Ric and Revolver is such a great album. I take it there fairly modern signatures that have been rejected.
I heard that Mccartney 's fruit shop didn't do so well in London. (Apple, it's a joke.)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tony Bonich on January 18, 2016 at 11:24pm

I've had the same problem from Roger while other authenticaters give a yes Mr E has given a no on something clearly authentic !!! But we are at the mercy of these Demi Gods in this proffession !!!
A little bit like the Andy Worhol committee you can have a REAL WORHOL given to you by him worth millions but if they do no
It's worth 20 bucks !! So you get a Dylan say signed in person that you obtain
It's worth say 1,500$ then to sell it on you need a mr Epperson letter !! But he deems it not good so it's a 10 buck item
We are at there mercy but what can we do ?? We need more authenticators !!!
This is NOT A DIG AT ROGER at all but as many of you may agree it is FACT !
And the work Mr Epoerson does is by enlarge great

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ru007 on June 18, 2019 at 1:35pm

Hi sorry to bother you but you seem very knowledgeable about all things Beatles signed, 

i recently purchase a Paul mccartney autographed item and it passed Epperson’s quick opinion and I recently had it fully authenticated by BAS Steve grad works for them now, my question is even though it already has a full coa letter from Beckett would you recommend me to send to Epperson as well? Reason I went to Beckett is because I went to a show in person and didn’t have to send it in 

thanks for any advice in advance 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• Next ›
• Page