Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on October 22, 2015 at 2:22pm

I don't like either of these.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on October 22, 2015 at 2:24pm

Agreed. These look really bad.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on October 22, 2015 at 2:36pm

Terrible!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on October 22, 2015 at 2:54pm

Thanks guy for your opinion. 

Mark

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on October 22, 2015 at 3:59pm

I dont doubt they were signed recently.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on October 22, 2015 at 4:55pm

Yuck, both terrible forgeries.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Viola on October 23, 2015 at 7:49am

Dont like them Mark.  If they were signed recently would they be just 'Paul'?  Havent seen a full signature since his in store appearances.  I know of people who have gotten him the last few years in NYC.  They are very sloppy & rushed 'Paul'

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on October 23, 2015 at 10:16am

my comment about being signed recently implied that they were not signed by Paul. just to clarify.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on October 23, 2015 at 1:32pm

I got what you ment.. :)  I just put in blonde high lights.  

Mark

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on October 23, 2015 at 5:07pm

These were supposedly signed for a long time friend of Sir Paul.  So it was a different setting.  Just to let you know.

thanks

Mark

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on October 23, 2015 at 5:18pm

Must not be such a good friend then, he had someone else sign his name for him! ;)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on October 23, 2015 at 5:29pm

there is always a story Mark.  but the real story is told by the signature, and in this case, its not a good story.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page