We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

No doubt I have reservations on this one. The only signature that looks legit is Paul's, but it could be a good forgery.

What do you guys think?

Views: 784

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

No good.

fake

Looks like someone's first attempt at a forgery....wow is it bad!

Awful!
Awful.
I wish I had four thumbs, I'd give it four thumbs down.

In Spain this would be called,"El Crapo!"

I agree that the john, george and Ringo are bad. Paul does not look like a common forgery.  If that were alone on this album, we would be looking at it differently.

I actually agree with you on that. I thought the same when I first looked at the Paul. The other three are brutally bad. However the Paul being dated 2001 we could look up examples. I still don't like it. Would be hard to ever appreciate a real Paul with three fakes on it too.

The Macca could be legit...but the rest?...don't think so!

I don't like any of them. McCartney looks like one of the forgeries attributed to a guy named Adrian in the UK:

http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/paul-mccartney-autog...

Hey Steve...I see what you mean. I've seen those Rock'n' Roll albums before...

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service