Authenticity is Everything
Beatles Signed Album
No doubt I have reservations on this one. The only signature that looks legit is Paul's, but it could be a good forgery.
What do you guys think?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Adam Halloran on
-
No good.
-
Permalink Reply by stu deitcher on
-
Looks like someone's first attempt at a forgery....wow is it bad!
-
Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on
-
Awful!
-
Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on
-
In Spain this would be called,"El Crapo!"
-
Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on
-
I agree that the john, george and Ringo are bad. Paul does not look like a common forgery. If that were alone on this album, we would be looking at it differently.
-
-
I actually agree with you on that. I thought the same when I first looked at the Paul. The other three are brutally bad. However the Paul being dated 2001 we could look up examples. I still don't like it. Would be hard to ever appreciate a real Paul with three fakes on it too.
-
-
The Macca could be legit...but the rest?...don't think so!
-
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on
-
I don't like any of them. McCartney looks like one of the forgeries attributed to a guy named Adrian in the UK:
http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/paul-mccartney-autog...
-
-
Hey Steve...I see what you mean. I've seen those Rock'n' Roll albums before...
As an eBay Partner Network Affiliate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Get Our Newsletter
© 2026 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
