Michael Jackson original?

What do you guys think about this signed piece of paper? Just asked Roger for a quick opinion and he said it's genuine but you can never be so sure with signed piece of papers.

Thank you!

1 member likes this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpeg, 411 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by wascher on December 2, 2015 at 9:34am

Looks good to me. Weird someone didn't trim the edge clean but the auto looks right imo.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SignedByTheKing on December 2, 2015 at 12:27pm

I was wondering about it too, but then I got a better pic and maybe this is the answer to our question! The pen apparently wasn't working so well, that's why Michael must have tried more than once to sign. In the upper part of the paper you can see that Michael tried to sign but the ink didn't work

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.jpeg, 1.3 MB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sandra Rose on December 2, 2015 at 6:02pm

This is a beautiful auto. I like that the paper is torn. Are you selling this?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SignedByTheKing on December 3, 2015 at 12:40pm

Im actually about to buy it :P

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on December 2, 2015 at 11:21pm

It's definitely real. As you point out, it seems clear that MJ had a bad pen. Really, whoever owns this, really gets two MJ autographs. I think it's kind of a unique piece, what with the first failed attempt to get the pen to work properly.

We've all been in a situation where we're trying to get a pen that is low on ink to write. Looking at this, you can imagine MJ's frustration to try to get the pen to work. It's kind of a cool item, really.