Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ArteXtrema on March 26, 2016 at 7:15am

All Opinions are welcome ! And of course very valuable for me.

Any specialist on Mj?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel John Clifford on March 26, 2016 at 7:25am

Yes talk to a member on here by name of Wascher she's really good with MJ autographs. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ArteXtrema on March 26, 2016 at 7:27am

Thank you very much for your feedback.

I will

Best wishes

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on March 26, 2016 at 8:58am

I would pass on this one. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ArteXtrema on March 26, 2016 at 9:04am

Hi Washer, I was going to contact you.

Thank you very much for your message.

I did not understand  your answer, do you mean it seems ok or  not?

Thanks in advance

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel John Clifford on March 26, 2016 at 9:15am

It means she wouldn't want it in her collection. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ArteXtrema on March 26, 2016 at 9:16am

Thanks Samuel for your explanation.

I was having doubts with the expression. Very Kind from you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ArteXtrema on May 28, 2016 at 5:42am

UPDATE:

A Michael jackson Specialist from Spain,  he has more than 400 Mj records and several authentic autographs, has analized this signature.

And  surprise! Gave me a positive feedback. 

In his opinion its a 100%  authentic MJ signature from 2004/2005. He has no doubt about it.

i´v questioned it two times.

 He said:

"I am in this,  since my six years old, and  about Michael, i know enough.

If you want an advice, l don't trust many certificates i see, because some are fake or made by the same people who sell them.

I ´v observed  your autograph and I can assure you that this is 100% original.

By What I see this a autograph was signed in mid of 2004 or 2005 by as is the signature.

In the mid 2000 the Michael "J"  Changed to something similar to an L. As you can observe. There are a lot of other things such as the "m" and the last "n". can be seen where it loads more the pen and those things where you can see if it is original or no.

I have no doubt the signature is 100% authentic."

Well,  i appreciate all for your support and opinions. 

I´v just wanted to share  and contribute with other opinion, cause sometimes you can have the same doubt, or compare another signature.

Best wishes

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by J.Seah on May 28, 2016 at 8:07am

I am not an expert on MJ. But I would not want this in my collection.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ArteXtrema on May 28, 2016 at 8:20am

Hi, Would you be so kind to tell me why?

You can also be free to write me in a private message.

Thank you in advance

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 28, 2016 at 8:48am

I don't think that it is genuine either. One of the most obvious things is the J. Besides being short, it starts and stops abruptly, not like something being spontaneously signed. You will not see that on accepted as genuine examples.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by ArteXtrema on May 28, 2016 at 9:01am

Thank you Steve for your kind, honest opinion.

Really apreciated.

I have two positive opinions and proofs,  that points to be authentic, but i´m open to here others. 

About the " j" that is short and stops abruptly, could be that happened not because of the lac of space, but because of the choice of the author? I mean, when we choose a space to sign, they are a lot of facts that change our signature as , rush, (or not), mood, feeling...  even space (lac of tables, or any place to sign straight), we don´t sign intentionaly different, we are constantly making small changes depending in our mood.

As an artist , i had several times,  that people asked me for an autograph, and sometimes "I did a bad choice" with the signing, i shorted or change small details from my signature, and this one independig of the author, has being signed real in the bottom.

Please let me know what you think.

Hope had express myself right.

Best wishes

óscar

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page