We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

To me this looks good but I would like to get other opinions. 

Views: 3926

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Great...sell it!

tell em the detailed story about how it was obtained by some shady deal on e bay oh sorry did they mean the original signing   who knows

Yes, because 5x your money is just a silly offer.

That is their business, and customers will be happy to pay someone like Tracks $1200. They have a reputation in the field.

Do you honestly believe that you can get more than $500 ?

Gio,

Please post the link that you gave PSA for their Quick Opinion. Let's see if we can figure out why they didn't like it and Tracks and Roger did.

Who is issuing the LOA?

Gio,

PSA issued a Quick Opinion on an autograph you posted in your Photo Bucket account? How did you get them to do that???

PSA/DNA only renders Quick Opinions on listed auction lots. They don't render QOs on items posted in Photo Bucket, Flicker, Tumblr, Facebook or any other links that are not part of an auction or on eBay.

They don't even offer Quick Opinions for autographs that dealers have priced for retail sale in their online stores. (But they will render them on eBay Buy-it-Nows.)

Here's an image of their Quick Opinion submission form for autographs not on eBay or one of the auction houses pre-populated in their QO submission list:

As you can see, you have to fill out the auction house name, the URL of the lot, the lot number—and confirm it, and post the description of the lot. If you submit a QO request for an autograph that's not in an auction they will respond "unable to render opinion."

Please explain.

Steve, I misread the question. You are correct PSA only renders opinions on Open Auctions. I will send you a snapshot of the results if you would like so you can believe me. It has my personal information so I'd rather not post it here.

Gio,

Why did you delete your answer to my question?

Luckily, I saved a screenshot of my question and your answer so we can figure out how we both misunderstood things:

Something seems very fraudulent about this whole story. I don't know if their was shill bidding involved or what, but I personally wouldn't trust the item because of all the shadiness involved.

If there was shill bidding don't you think it would not have ended at 101$? the shill bidder would have put a higher bid in than that and kept increasing my bid which they didn't.

If there was shill bidding it would have been on the lot when it was listed by The Memorabilia Vault and sold for $930.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service