We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
I find this very perplexing. I found an autograph of Paul McCartney in my everpresent search for the elusive "guaranteed" authentic signature. You all have been very helpful, and I am hoping you can help me sort this out. I submitted the following to Roger Epperson, and he deemed it genuine. I also submitted it to PSA quick opinion and it came back "likely not genuine." This confuses me. I know Roger is very knowledgeable.... why would PSA come back with a negative opinion in this case? Gar.
Tags:
A no brainer. Roger's opinion over PSA's all day long.
So we can conclude The Standard Bearer is incompetent ? I wonder if you spent several hundred
dollars if the opinion would be different? From a pure cost efficiency perspective I bet you can find
an incorrect opinion for 5 to 7 dollars if you tried.
Don't you think The Emperors New Suit is Magnificent ?
I also believe that PSA erred in the case of this Macca signature, but it can go either way when they disagree like this. You shouldn't assume that the same one is always going to be correct.
Relying on quick opinions not the way to go unless you intend to submit it after purchase AND you have a money back guarantee from a solid seller.
It looks good to me.
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on October 30, 2024 at 3:13pm 2 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service