Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 9, 2020 at 11:19pm

I think not.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Morris on May 9, 2020 at 11:41pm

Oh no

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF To Dan Morris on May 10, 2020 at 10:14am

Just curious what you don’t like about this signature?  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by autographcollector1 To terrier8HOF on May 10, 2020 at 10:16am

I actually think it could be real.  Curious if Ballroom or Richard Booth or one of those folks has an opinion.  I think it looks pretty good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 To autographcollector1 on May 10, 2020 at 10:24am

I’d also like to know what the concerns are about this signature. I thought it looked pretty good too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF To BallroomDays67 on May 10, 2020 at 10:40am

my first impression was authentic, which is why I asked what the concerns were.  This does not scream out "forgery" in fact I think it has a lot of positives.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 To terrier8HOF on May 10, 2020 at 10:43am

I totally agree. That was my first impression too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin To BallroomDays67 on May 10, 2020 at 11:21am

It’s so squished, but does have positive characteristics. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin To terrier8HOF on May 10, 2020 at 11:17am

My first impression was possibly real, but after studying it and looking for exemplars I don’t think it is. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF To Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 10, 2020 at 11:55am

here is a similar rushed version:

https://goldinauctions.com/lot-27622.aspx

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 To Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 10, 2020 at 12:25pm

Here’s one from Heritage:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin To BallroomDays67 on May 10, 2020 at 12:28pm

OK...I stand corrected!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page