Lennon: Thoughts?

Tags: Beatles, Lennon

Views: 405

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Susanne DeKerk on September 7, 2019 at 11:51am

not good.

Permalink Reply by FB on September 7, 2019 at 3:07pm

Any more opinions out there?

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2019 at 3:14pm

It's Saturday. Give it time unless you're planning to bid.

Permalink Reply by James on September 7, 2019 at 4:41pm

I don’t like it.

Permalink Reply by spaceman on September 7, 2019 at 5:10pm

I would say likely authentic. 

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on September 7, 2019 at 5:48pm

This has both a Frank Caiazzo and a Perry Cox LOA and was signed in 1967. Don't see too many "first name only" Lennon's -- which makes it worth less than a full one so not for every collector. 

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on September 7, 2019 at 5:53pm

I've seen this before. It's a signed photo of Lennon...first name only from 1967...

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 7, 2019 at 6:19pm

It was authenticated by Caiazzo and Tracks UK. A first name only Lennon is rough, but it has great characteristics and apparently good provenance. Also, I’m not aware of a single Beatles autograph mistake from Tracks.

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2019 at 6:26pm

I was stumped on this.

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo To Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2019 at 6:40pm

I thought it might be good but was hesitant to say so.

Permalink Reply by Mark Saunders on September 7, 2019 at 7:40pm

I’d buy it. Who is selling?

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on September 7, 2019 at 8:56pm

FB, it's great that you posted a closeup, but please also post a good image of the entire autograph when there is one. It helps determine authenticity more accurately.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service