We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

I picked up this as a Carroll O'Connor single signed photo many years ago. Probably ebay, but I can't recall.

Then, I sent TTM to the rest of the cast members for completion.

Do I have any clunkers on here?

(Click for supersize image)

Tags: All, Family, in, the

Views: 1090

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The Rob Reiner and Sally Struthers sigs are the same ones I see on everything, but I don't know whether they're secretarial or genuine. The Jean Stapleton looks really smashed together and a bit odd so I'm not sure about it being authentic. You're sure the Carroll O'Connor is good?

Actually, the Stapleton was the one I was least concerned about. I sent her a letter first and she replied back with a handwritten note saying she'd be happy to sign it.

I am not sure the O'connor is ok. It looks ok from my cursory research, but I was hoping someone with expertise would know for sure.

I figured the JS and SS were probably ok. The other two are higher risk.

I can't say I have any expertise. I'm just barely familiar with their signatures after seeing some here or there over the years. But I don't think there are any or many renowned experts on All in the Family signatures so a thread like this may be good to piece together the facts.

The O'Connor is a little off in my recollection of them because every O'Connor autograph I've seen has the n's highest point at about half of the r at the end. They're about equal in this one. The r itself isn't exactly what I've seen but it may just be another variant or signed at a different time then the pieces I've seen. Also it seems there's fairly often a break between the last r and the o in Carroll, though I doubt that's on every one.

The Jean Stapleton may be genuine and just more recent than anything I've seen, but it'd be hard to tell with everything so smashed together.

Why is the Rob Reiner auto cut off?

I don't know. I suspect maybe another sheet of paper or the envelope got in the way... so it clipped the end of the sig.

interesting......the Stapleton is the one that looks the least consistent but maybe she has changed her signature style in her later years.  the o'connor may be secretarial.  I have one just like it, and one on an index card that is totally different.

I ran this by Bill White at RR Auction. He felt the Carroll O'Connor was a forgery.

Ugh. What a waste of time adding the other three sigs.

When I compared to the other examples in the RR archives, the O'Connor is close, but there are some differences. It seems the letters -- especially the rr and nn -- on the example above are a bit more well-formed and stretched out than in what I see in the RR archives. 

This is why I avoid Hollywood items. LOL  I mean, who is out there forging Carroll O'Connor for heaven's sake?

Sorry Zippy,

Could be worse. Josh Board spent 20 years completing a Beatles-signed Sgt. Pepper's 45. He writes this great story on it and sends me the photos:

The Lennon signature on the record when he bought it in '89 wasn't real.

It goes to show you almost can't be too careful and never assume.

I bought the O'Connor over 10 years ago... and at that time who would think someone was forging a $30 autograph? A quick review shows it's pretty close to the limited other examples I could find... so I think it's good. And it's done pretty well... it's not an obvious hack job. Sheesh...

Lesson learned.

Ahhh... how horrible. A bad experience for sure. Did you find out whether the other three signatures were good?

Bill felt the other 3 are not known to use secretary, so they were likely ok. He did mention the Stapleton was odd, but it was a moot point with a fake Archie.

What? No Joey signature?

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service