We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Authenticity is Everything
Beatles Autographs From June, 1967 - Opinions?
Here’s the description:
Studio One, EMI Studios, Abbey Road in London, Saturday 24. June 1967
The Beatles announced that on 25.June they were be appearing on the 'Our World' global live television broadcast.
Before that, orchestral rehearsals were performed in the EMI studio on Abbey Road.
The Beatles and EMI threw open on 24.June the usually closed Abbey Road studio doors to more than a hundred journalists and photographers for a press-call.
The Journalist Graham Morris was there and got an autograph from the Beatles.
The signatures are on a off white notebook-sheet, in blue ink and the size of the sheet is 4.3 x 6.3 inches.
I give guarantee that the signatures are not a copy, print or preprint and original signed with pen. Since the Beatles did not sign in front of my own eyes, I offer it as a reproduction. The Beatles autograph experts will recognize it.
Ready to frame.
Tags: 1967, Beatles, sammlerobjekte, susannesusu123
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on
-
I think it looks like it was used to create the set on the left. Roger actually authenticated the set on the right, apparently back in 2008.
-
Permalink Reply by james conger on
-
Really 67 ? looks 1964 & same hand! the 1 supplied by Ballroom later, I'd say not Authentic.
-
-
There's NO way any member would write 67 in 1967 & certainly not Beatles at the top of any signing FACT. All the same hand & FAKE.
-
Permalink Reply by Jim McFiver on
-
Ballroom: this stuff drives me nuts. Grrrrrrrrr.
-
Permalink Reply by fab432 on
-
I just read the auction description and if you haven’t read it here is the important part.
” The Journalist Graham Morris was there and got an autograph from the Beatles.
The signatures are on a off white notebook-sheet, in blue ink and the size of the sheet is 4.3 x 6.3 inches.I give guarantee that the signatures are not a copy, print or preprint and original signed with pen. Since the Beatles did not sign in front of my own eyes, I offer it as a reproduction. The Beatles autograph experts will recognize it.”First time I’ve seen a seller imply that the signatures are genuine and then in the next sentence say they are sold as reproductions. That takes the cake.
-
-
There are now two active listings of this item from seller susannesusu123. This one has a low BIN price and no mention of the Beatles in the auction title.
-
-
I asked the seller the obvious question and she told me someone wanted to buy it for $1250.
-
-
It did sell for $1,250. The authentic set I posted sold for $13,750.
-
Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on
-
Same seller sold two John Lennon autographs in the past 6 months that went WAY lower than they should have. Suspect to say the least.
BEATLES JOHN LENNON AUTOGRAPH MAY 1963 IPSWICH WHITE HORSE HOTEL / RARE (#224324180585)r***o (84)US $711.00Past 6 monthsExcellent autograph quick shipping thanks.BEATLES JOHN LENNON AUTOGRAPH JULY 1972 SAN FRANCISCO WITH OWN RED PEN / RARE (#224315899454) $1000
-
-
It says in the discreption and item specific that is sold as a reproduction. What is the problem?
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on
-
There is the implication it is genuine, and folks don't pay $711 for things they think are reproductions.
Photos
Videos
Groups
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
