We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
It looks like there’s a repaired tear that affected Paul’s signature.
Well spotted. That whole area has a light tone to it. I hope it's not from the repair job.
It a nice early '63 set of Beatles autographs...
It’s been restored with a “coating to the side of the signatures". Which means, it has more than likely been laminated. Think a Babe Ruth shellacked baseball, to one that wasn’t. This sold in December for 4,500 pounds and obviously was returned to the same auction house selling it now, because of the “coating” \not being mentioned in the original description in December. This card has bounced around over the years in several different auctions, including Barrett-Jackson in the States in 2007.
That tear wouldn't bother me. Nor does a set cleaned, repaired or restored. That set is incredibly rare and as long as the signatures weren't tampered with, I'd accept some restoration.
Now, the so-called 'lamination' would not be acceptable because, in my opinion, the signatures were tampered with.
If a seller says something has been restored that usually means big time restoration. Any serious seller would include a "before and after" comparison or at least describe the restoration in detail.
The last close-up. Tilt your screen back. Not for me!
From the auction house:
“Hello,
Kind regards,
Bourne End Auction Rooms”
so it seems perhaps a tear was repaired and then they painted a preserver around the signatures which got on some of the signatures.
Posted by CJCollector on November 27, 2024 at 2:23pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service