We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Hey guys,

I would very much like opinions on this piece from eBay seller ''rb-autogramme-berlin''. I've bought from this in-person dealer before (with utmost satisfaction), and know he is very well regarded by European collectors. This all makes me pretty confident in this Eastwood piece. However, you will notice the signature seems very rushed/atypical. I just want to cover all bases and defer to opinions of people who extensively studied Eastwood. Could you please help? Thanks in advance!

http://www.ebay.com/itm/180771553399?_trksid=p2055119.m1438.l2649&a...

Views: 1268

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I still believe for slightly more investment you could find a nicely signed photo with a more typical signature. But, if they please you, then go for it! Good luck whatever you decide.

Thanks Joe. I've sent you a friend request so I can msg you. If that's OK, I'd like your opinion on a few more Eastwood items.

I accepted your request. Thanks.

Hello,

I have to agree with Joe. I"d want something that screams "CLINT" rather than a signature that causes questions such as those which began this thread.

Eric

There is a signature study for more examples if anyone needs (post more on there as well there at your leisure)

http://live.autographmagazine.com/forum/topics/clint-eastwood-signa...

Roland wasn't very happy about this post. I only offered my honest opinion that it wasn't what I was used to seeing. I never said the subject autographs were forgeries and even offered maybe they were signed at some earlier time. If he obtained them himself from Clint Eastwood I have no problem with it. I just haven't seen any others this style. I never meant to try to harm his reputation.

I didn't see anyone mention they were fakes or question the integrity of the seller. I know we all have heard story after story of in-person signatures getting obtained and later failed TPA examinations. One of the risks when obtaining an autograph in-person, sometimes the outcome is less than desired. I was speaking from the standpoint of being the best choice to add to someone's collection. Which there are better, more typical examples to be had. In the end, the individual collector decides what looks acceptable in their eyes.

I think it's just one of those things where everyone's point of view is justified. On the one hand, we, as collectors, want to have peace of mind regarding authenticity, which is why we go on these forums to get opinions from uninterested and knowledgeable people who can help. On the other hand, some dealers such as Roland who work many years to build their reputation see their items scrutinized/criticized. I think it's clear you or others did not want to hurt Roland's reputation - its just a tricky situation.

I agree with Joe, thats half of the problem is dealing with the tpa's and getting them passed, esp if your laying out thousands of dollars for a graph.
Once the item is sold from a trusted seller, than that item is your investment it wouldn't matter if it was bought from jo blow. I've bought items from stand up guys and it doesn't mean much when you own the item and want to sell it.
Most of these ip guys think every item they obtain think that it will pass a tpa co.
It is like my Pete Townshend I bought from in person collector Josh Clark. It isn't your "typical" fully signed signature, but there are circumstances and quick signatures and certain conditions that leads an artist to have to shorten their signature.

I try to limit my opinion lately, because you never know unless you see it signed yourself. Obviously you can tell if something is clearly a forgery. Otherwise it is safer buying a normal "desirable" signature. If you trust the source and know where it is coming from and don't plan on reselling then it is worth it for sure!

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service