I'm just curious -- do all three companies use the same exemplars when making "likely genuine" or "no likely genuine" decisions? What database do they use? Do all three have access to the same databases? How does one company deem an autograph "likely genuine" while the other deems the same autograph " not likely genuine"? Anyone have an answer?
Tags:
There are the exemplars but what one does with them and how one interprets them is also important. IMHO
They don't use the same exemplar "database" because their is no central exemplar database. They each put together their own. I'm sure that some of the exemplars they use are the same though.
Agree. My Gleason exemplars include those which I have identified myself. Bowie as well. I have spoke to others and they do things very different than I do - and others have no idea why I do what I do. I like this in a way - together, these skills combine and illuminate. Separate, they have different, unique strengths.
correct and thats one off the biggest problems and 2 your dealing with human oppinions.
i know for a fact some top inperson stuff that have been rejected that are real by psa
I can believe that on other autographs, but how can they miss on 100 genuine Mantles? From a signing yet?
And would Mantle do a signing for just 100 items?
Posted by CJCollector on December 22, 2024 at 8:52am 2 Comments 2 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on December 5, 2024 at 3:03pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on November 27, 2024 at 2:23pm 0 Comments 1 Like
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.