We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Hi. I've found some autographed photos after my deceased father and I was wondering whether they are genuine? Second photo looks like preprint to my amateur eyes, but am not sure what to think about first and third.

Views: 418

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Put their names in the heading and you're more than likely to get comments. If you just put in real or fake, you're going to be ignored.

Ok the first and third photos have “autopen” signatures which are nice but not hand signed. The third photo is a nice photo from the “Revolution” era and these are rarer than the early auto penned photos. The 2nd photo has pre printed signatures.

Second is pretty questionable. Others are pre-prints. 

I believe the second one was signed on their behalf by Neil Aspinall.

The 1st and last pics are first name autopens....the pic from 1969 looks to be by Neil Aspinall...none are genuine...

Yes, first and third are autopens. Neil Aspinall Beatles signatures are considered collectible and do have value.

Oh. That's a pity. Thank you very much for your help, everyone. 

Oh. That's a pity. Thank you very much for your help, everyone. 

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service