Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on May 29, 2015 at 1:50pm

I've never seen one so "rushed" but it's got a shot at being authentic. Maybe one for the experts to tell.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Beatles410 on May 29, 2015 at 5:18pm

"Rushed" or just heavily medicated!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on May 29, 2015 at 8:15pm

Looks real

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Full Time Flipper on May 31, 2015 at 10:32am

I used to have one similar though not quite as rushed that was genuine so looks good to me i doubt a forger would be able to make it so bad if you know what i mean

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on May 31, 2015 at 7:14pm

Here is a picture of my who set from around 1966 or so.the nicest part of the set is the keith moon sig.when I saw how nice ithe keith sig was,I had to buy it.i picked it up from tracks .

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpg, 215 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on June 1, 2015 at 1:41am

Great item Paul! The Keith signature is very nice!

I have the same thoughts as everyone else on this discussion regarding the piece I posted. it looks like it could be real its flowing.. However the 'moon' part of the signature is bothering me. Is there an authentic example of Keith's signature identical to the one I posted? Not sure..

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on June 1, 2015 at 8:41am

Hi Rob,thanks for the kudos on my piece.ive seen many keith sigs with such a sloppy and rushed moon.do some homework,Google keith moon signatures and you will see a lot of them that look rushed and sloppy like this one.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Teresa Stone on September 24, 2017 at 12:15pm

The K, the E, the 60s autograph paper, ball point pen, the rushed aspect.....Its Real.

• ▶ Reply