Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by wascher on October 8, 2013 at 3:42pm

IMO this is NOT something I would not jump on (personally).  Not unless there is some sort of photos showing MJ signing that exact signature.  And it very well could be his.   Just too many weird things with it.  Looks like an ink blob at 2nd peak in M (He never starts N stops his M, its one swift motion) so either the pen is leaky or- Then it looks like his formation of J is beginning (indentation) on the paper, and its like his J formation really is, but now there is NO ink ;)   Just too weird, too inconsistent, and because I've seen PSA make a big blunder on MJ sigs already - to me it just wouldn't be worth purchasing.  Just not enough of it there to make a real judgement for me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steven Jackson on October 8, 2013 at 9:30pm

was told it was signed in person for the seller in 1982 if that helps

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on October 8, 2013 at 10:43pm

It might be a rushed in-person signature, hence the inconsistencies with the writing. It is hard to authenticate it as it is different to his usual none rushed examples.

• ▶ Reply