Michael Jackson signed Rolling Stone magazine

This is a Rolling Stone magazine from February 17th 1983. Obviously, the MJ autograph is not not from the 80s. Looks like maybe it was signed in the late-1990s/ early-2000s? It comes with an LOA from Roger Epperson. So do you think it’s authentic?

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by autographcollector1 on June 2, 2019 at 11:09pm

I personally don't like it. Doesn't feel right to me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Shaggy67 on June 3, 2019 at 2:58pm

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on June 3, 2019 at 5:38pm

I’m beginning to think this might resemble a forgery style that Wascher elaborated on. Not sure though.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on June 9, 2019 at 5:48pm

Does anyone else have thoughts on this one?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Yannick on June 12, 2019 at 2:18am

Fake!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by SignedByTheKing on June 12, 2019 at 7:01am

I personally don’t like it. I’ve seen other signed items with a fairly similar style. What I find odd is the very big M, J and N with a very small loop in the L. Another thing I don’t really like (but it’s a pretty small detail) is the top of the J. Usually when the loop of the L crosses the lower portion of the J, the top of the J should lean towards the right, because that’s how naturally the flow would go. Here it leans in both cases towards the left. Again, I could maybe see MJ signing multiple items for a dealer and the signature turns out a little odd, but what I don’t like is the fact that 1) the markers are different colors and usually the one signing keeps the same marker 2) usually dealers use black/green, not red so often