Paul Mccartney signed white album, authentic?

Views: 1637

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Spud on May 22, 2016 at 4:29am

i dont like it

Permalink Reply by Devon Laney on May 22, 2016 at 9:35am
Not authentic, IMO.
Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on May 22, 2016 at 11:01am

Agreed. I would say no.

Permalink Reply by Nick Maas on May 22, 2016 at 7:40pm
I don't think Paul has added the date to his signature in awhile. Although it's a nice attempt, it just doesn't feel right to me.
Permalink Reply by Andre Johnson on May 24, 2016 at 1:58pm
Not authentic at all.Sorry!
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 24, 2016 at 2:38pm

There are things that concern me about it but I'm not as convinced as everyone else is that it's fake.

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on May 24, 2016 at 3:44pm

I am

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 24, 2016 at 4:16pm

Yep...only person who thinks it might have a chance is me. No doubt I'm OTL here.

Permalink Reply by James on May 24, 2016 at 10:50pm
The "t" part makes it look bad, but it does have some positive attributes.
Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 24, 2016 at 11:00pm

The most telling thing is that it is or was for sale on a website for £250, so that should be no-brainer fake, but something about it makes me not want to write it off.

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on May 24, 2016 at 11:07pm
I do agree with Steve. I don't like the date, it looks too detached from the signature, but the 'l' of Paul looks good to me with that part of the signature.

Here is one of my in-person signatures for comparison of that part.
Attachments: No photo uploads here
Permalink Reply by Pablo on November 15, 2018 at 11:58am

I was wondering what was the final veredict on this autograph. It’s currently being sold,at EBay,with a Frank and Perry LOA. (My first post) :)

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service