We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Views: 1617

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

i dont like it

Not authentic, IMO.

Agreed. I would say no.

I don't think Paul has added the date to his signature in awhile. Although it's a nice attempt, it just doesn't feel right to me.
Not authentic at all.Sorry!

There are things that concern me about it but I'm not as convinced as everyone else is that it's fake.

I am

Yep...only person who thinks it might have a chance is me. No doubt I'm OTL here.

The "t" part makes it look bad, but it does have some positive attributes.

The most telling thing is that it is or was for sale on a website for £250, so that should be no-brainer fake, but something about it makes me not want to write it off.

I do agree with Steve. I don't like the date, it looks too detached from the signature, but the 'l' of Paul looks good to me with that part of the signature.

Here is one of my in-person signatures for comparison of that part.
Attachments: No photo uploads here

I was wondering what was the final veredict on this autograph. It’s currently being sold,at EBay,with a Frank and Perry LOA. (My first post) :)

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service