Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on July 4, 2019 at 12:39pm

Autograph Live is all about discussing things, Mr Mojo. Especially authenticity. No need to tell us to stop.

Permalink Reply by Samuel Mumenthaler on July 4, 2019 at 12:45pm

Do you think these are LATER forgeries? In 1963 the Stones were not very popular yet. That's why I sent the link with the lot these are part of - all signatures from the early Sixites. Some said, these could me made all in the hand of Bill Wyman. In this case, he must have been a quite talented forger. I would be very happy, to see some of those "Wyman sets" mentionned in this blog. Please post! AND: Are these Wyman sets from 1963?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel Mumenthaler on July 4, 2019 at 12:51pm

PS: I am referring to set that was posted at the beginning of this discussion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on July 4, 2019 at 1:19pm

There aren't Bill Wyman set in this discussion... Bill Wyman set are different.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 4, 2019 at 1:22pm

Why not post the ones you showed in the thread I linked? Those were said to be all in the hand of Wyman, no? As I recall you were not sure?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on July 4, 2019 at 1:24pm

There is a my discussion in this site "strange Rolling Stones", and there are many Wyman sets in that discussion. Please you watch...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 4, 2019 at 1:28pm

Watch what? Who do you think has been linking to that thread? In it you say something like you can't tell if they are or not by Wyman. Your actual thread title was "Strange but authentic?". I said some time ago these (OP) might be all Wyman. Seems they might be after all. Three or four skilled people have apparently identified the same hand for (the same) three of these signatures - that is "strange", no?

In your "Strange but authentic?" thread you asked about a Wyman set...

"...I think early early signatures or signed by one for all... no?..."

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on July 5, 2019 at 12:07am

Skilled people? Where? I studied the rolling stones signatures in the last 3/4 years... and i know the signatures. Roger Epperson is good and KeithSpoon here.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on July 4, 2019 at 9:06pm

BTW, I just double checked the description on this set I uploaded. It states authenticated by Roger Epperson. Here is the link.

https://www.historyforsale.com/the-rolling-stones-autograph/dc155204

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on July 5, 2019 at 3:50am

Reputable dealer, and reputable authenticator.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mr Mojo Risin on July 5, 2019 at 6:50am

Late 1963/ early 1964

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on July 4, 2019 at 1:24pm

The Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and Bill Wyman autographs on the newspaper page in the original post all appear to be signed by the same hand.  The item posted by Joe W appears to contain four atypical Rolling Stones autographs.  Just my two credits....

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 3
• 4
• 5
• 6
• 7
• Next ›
• Page