We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Any opinions? Chris, what do you think?

Views: 909

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Authentic, IMO.

We don't usally get so many differing opinions.

Maybe its a little off authentic sig. I like the Mickey.

authentic IMO

What is the question about this authentic Mantle?

Authentic.

Thanks Chris, I appreciate the input.

You're welcome, Steve.

I agree with Christopher, this is no-question authentic. Not even a question. 

Obviously I have a lot of respect for Chris and Ryan, but I can't see how anyone can declare a fuzzy, photocopy quality image a "no brainer." You are basing that judgement on one factor alone -- shape of the autograph. There is absolutely no indication of speed or pressure evident in this image. Or size for that matter... Would it still be a no brainer if it was a tiny signature on an 8x10 image?

Perhaps it is fine, but I tend to be very careful about making declarations unless I have assessed the WHOLE picture.

I'm with you Steve.  

I saw enough from the picture to tell it was authentic in about 2 seconds, the only factor missing is whether or not it is real ink or printed, which can't really be judged from a scan to begin with. It's textbook Mantle, nothing even atypical.

Like i said in my earlier post to blurry of an image.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service