Comment by Robby93 on September 25, 2023 at 2:09pm

I don't know, but the caption on this photograph says 1981 in Roman numerals.....

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 2:18pm

Yes that is why I posted it.

Comment by Robby93 on September 25, 2023 at 2:18pm

Although I am unfamiliar with this movie, I did a quick google on it. It was originally released in November of 78' and re-released in 1979. The photo is dated 1981 and the sig is from 79'. I still don't understand the problem.......

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 2:20pm

How does the signature predate the photograph's copyright date?

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 2:20pm

Or why?

Comment by Robby93 on September 25, 2023 at 2:25pm

I see. That indeed is puzzling. I wouldn't see a reason to predate the photo but it still doesn't make sense. I guess just on that reason I would reject it, although the sig is not that off to me. And once again, the numbers look correct. I'm gonna continue to look into this one when time allows.....

Comment by Robby93 on September 25, 2023 at 2:26pm

Possible misprint on the photo with date?

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 2:33pm

MCMVXXIX to MCMVXXXI? Possible. 

Comment by Eric Keith Longo on September 25, 2023 at 2:42pm

There are movie posters with 1978, 1979 and 1981 so no typo I think.

Comment by Robby93 on September 25, 2023 at 2:46pm

That actually could make sense. I know we have a difference on the sig, I think it's pretty good

Comment

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 6
• 7
• 8
• 9
• Next ›
• Page