I just wanted to post these here to see what Fudd the Lowly Mantle Collector can do to help stop the flood of forgeries into the market place. The goal is that we can all start educating ourselves before we buy. To see what a beautiful signature the Mick had, and to learn to distinguish it from the obvious forgeries at first glance. Something TTA, STAT, DREW MAX, GAI GLOBAL (Baker certs) My Favorite Players Reborn (Tony Podsada) & Christopher Morales can't seem to do....at all? You will almost never see a signature in this photo album collection that would match or come close to anything that has been certed by any of those guys. Maybe you'll find 1 in a 1000 if you're lucky. To tell the difference between what an original hand signed Photo by the Mick looks like vs. an obvious Fake at first glance is easy. Give it a try. It's Fun!
As has been told many times, The Mick made more in one signing than his dad did in 1 year. He felt obligated to his fans to give them a "work of art". He did this by signing on just the right spot for the particular photograph he was presented. The size of his signature was determined by how big the sweet spot was. He knew EXACTLY how to fit his signature in so it looked perfect. A thing of beauty really. Please note that these are not all the same signature over and over, but merely a sample from my collection. What I do know is that these are consistent with the WAY Mantle signed and structured his Autograph as we know it. Good luck! FUDD
AUTHENTIC EXEMPLARS-PHOTOS
http://s1342.beta.photobucket.com/user/fuddjcal/library/Mickey%20Ma...
AUTHENTIC EXEMPLARS-BALLS
http://s1342.beta.photobucket.com/user/fuddjcal/library/Mickey%20Ma...
Here's one that would throw off some people because of the atypical "M" in Mantle, but this is a 100% authentic Mantle ball, you CANNOT look at just one letter:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/MICKEY-MANTLE-AUTOGRAPHED-BASEBALL-/1117712...
Absolutely correct, Ryan!!! I saw that Mantle on Ebay.
Hi guys, I'm new to this thread but would like to get people's opinion on the attached Mantle I just picked up at an antique's shop. Looks good to me but curious what everyone else thinks, especially on the connection between the "M" and "a" (noticed that wasn't common on other authentic examples) and the slanting up of the "antle". It seems to 'flow' correctly but is the upwards slant a function of Mantle signing faster/sloppier than usual? Any insights / feedback much appreciated.
I think its good Andrew.but not purdy.
Thanks Tony and Steve. Any idea when or what era this might have been signed? Late 70s? Thanks again
It looks good to me, too, Andrew...a classic, no question genuine Mantle. But make sure it's not a copy, a signed photo that was reproduced. It's very hard to tell that without seeing it in person.
1) Make sure it's not a digitally-reproduced photo. Mantle died before they were widely available, if available at all, and were no where near the quality they are today.
2) Make sure the signature has disturbed the finish on the photo and doesn't look like it has the same gloss as the rest of the pic.
Picked up this picture recently - wanting an opinion on the signature. Picture is in great condition hoping that it is a real one, but not sure.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Posted by CJCollector on December 22, 2024 at 8:52am 2 Comments 2 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on December 5, 2024 at 3:03pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on November 27, 2024 at 2:23pm 0 Comments 1 Like
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
You need to be a member of Autograph Live to add comments!
Join Autograph Live