Authenticity is Everything
Would a note with the person's first name be considered an autograph?
To make it simple suppose I had a note from Lou Gehrig when he was a kid that says, "Thanks for the Christmas gifts" in Lou's handwriting. Furthermore, instead of signing it Lou Gehrig he just writes Lou. Now the fact that he didn't write Gehrig, does this now technically not make it a signature or autograph? Furthermore, being the fact that it is a note does this take away from it being an autograph? Since it was written as a teenager it would probably be the earliest Lou Gehrig signature in existence, I guess if you would call it an autograph.
For simple argument sake there is strong provenance that supports that it was indeed Lou Gehrig who wrote the note, so lets not argue whether it is legit or not, but instead focus on the fact Gehrig is not after Lou and the fact that it is a note and not some fan asking for an autograph. Obviously, one way or another its valuable, but once again I wonder how the market would see it?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by TQ on
-
Im curious to see peoples thoughts on this.
Id consider it an autograph and given the rarity/provenance of the item I would imagine it would be very desirable. I know as a collector, I actually prefer these kind of unique/personal items to someone just signing their name. Any extra handwriting to me is a plus and handy when it comes to authentication. That it lacks his last name I think makes it more personable as it was clearly written to someone significant to him about something significant. If I had to choose between the one you describe and a basic signature, Id certainly prefer yours.
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on
-
+1
© 2025 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
