We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Thoughts on this one appreciated. Thank-you.

Views: 451

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Not real IMO. 

with eric anything is possible as his grapg  is all over the place. u need to know ur source

but the second half looks bad

Thanks Marc & Steve. I appreciate your thoughts.

Anyone else willing to share their thoughts on this one?

I'd avoid anything not typical - it is just going to be a hassle. I don't like this one.

You are absolutely right, Eric. The source is a point of consideration but some of these "in person" sellers offer questionable materials. It may be genuine but that does not mean it can be verified. The signature not only has to be genuine it must also be within acceptable perimeters. Not a knock on in person sellers but that cannot be the most important consideration. It still comes down to the ink. 

when it comes to clapton hes not consisant so that really doesnt work.he signiture is all over the place and can change from graph to graph. its all over the map so know ur source is reallty wise

I like the Eric, not the Clapton. And...for him...I wouldn't trust ANY autograph dealer, selling one. Unless you get it from a person that worked with him, or some situation like that (and it's the only autograph they have), I wouldn't feel comfortable buying it.

i agree about the eric part  

i got eric a few 100 times inperson and he was all over the place with his signiture

Sorry, this is not real.

Thanks, Richard. I appreciate you chiming in!

That's pretty far off and not signed as fast as normal for him. Most of Clapton's autographs are some variation of these, depending on year, if rushed and other things. Some can super-rushed but you can usually still tell some version of the core characteristics. Especially the end of the E going to the L.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service