As always, authenticity opinions and comments would be most appreciated!

Views: 491

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm thinking this one is likely authentic. Here is another that is fairly similar.

Thanks for looking, Joe....and for the exemplar!

This is fine. There appears to be some emulsion issues upper left but a fine photo. Double weight?

Eric - Thanks for looking. I don't think those are emulsion issues, actually...it seems to be the scan.  Yes, double-weight.  It's very early for him.

Indeed, very early. I am speaking about the goldish tone - did you use Auto-correct?

I see what you mean in the upper left corner... that small spot.

Not a spot but  golden area in his shadow. Above his head to just around his shoulder. Tilt the screen a touch back and forth.

Okay I see what you mean.  I'll have to ask for some clarification on that and maybe a close up photo.  Thanks!

Sure! I've seen this before.

Sometimes it is a development issue, other times a storage issue. 

Yes...it could be in the negative, emulsion or discoloration on the photo or just simply a glare on the scan.  Need more info..

Well, it's not going to be the negative. Why print a defective photo in such quality? My guess is the emulsion from that color - perhaps it was not rinsed properly when printed.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service