We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Tags:
Not signed by the boys IMO.
It looks oddly correct for me. I like it.
I like it too. It’s deceiving at first because of how awkwardly Paul signed the first name portion of his signature.
That was my first reaction as well. I was leaning towards not genuine then I settled on probably rushed.
From Omega's Website: Provenance: A family member of the vendor worked for Rediffusion and was present during filming for TV special 'Around The Beatles' on 28th April 1964. As well as taking photographs of the band (twelve 4x6" and one 6.5 x 8.5" black and white prints of those photos included in the lot) they obtained the signatures on this LP on the day. The signed LP came to the vendor on their 21st birthday. Authenticated by Roger Epperson.
Loose as a goose but nicely legible. I bow to higher authorities as to authenticity but being slightly atypical is usually a good sign and the studio photos add even more positive evidence.
Looks OK...
the paul does look odd, but I would go for genuine
Posted by CJCollector on September 6, 2024 at 3:22pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on September 2, 2024 at 8:30am 0 Comments 0 Likes
Posted by CJCollector on September 1, 2024 at 3:00pm 0 Comments 1 Like
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service